Data underlying the publication: A holistic look at creativity: Evaluating pupils’ creative design ideation and prototypes through comparative judgment

This study investigates how 20 industrial design students used the method of comparative judgment to holistically assess design ideas and prototypes produced by 201 pupils aged 10 to 14 in the Netherlands. This dataset includes (1) the codebook used to code the comments generated by industrial design students (acting as judges) during the process of comparative judgment, using the platform of No More Marking, (2) judges’ decision data about pupils’ design ideation, design prototype, and design by types—obtained from No More Marking, (3) the parameter values and rankings of portfolios (design ideation, design prototype, design by types), and judge misfit data obtained from the Adaptive Comparative Judgement App (https://jeffbuckley1992.shinyapps.io/comparative_judgement/), (4) code examination and inter-rater reliability data.