Description
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) is an imaging technique for simultaneous estimation of multiple quantitative parameters in a single acquisition. The efficiency of MRF results from strong k-space undersampling, but this can go at the expense of strong aliasing artifacts. The errors due to undersampling can be predicted based on a mathematical model leveraging on perturbation
theory. We exploited this model to perform MRF sequence optimization by adjusting the MRF flip angle train. Numerical simulations showed that the undersampling errors can be suppressed by sequence optimization. This was further corroborated in eight in vivo scans. The results were compared to sequences with a conventionally shaped flip angle pattern and an optimized pattern based on the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRB). A sequence optimized for improved robustness against undersampling with a flip angle train of length 400 yielded significantly lower median absolute errors T1 (5.6%±2.9%) and T2 (7.9%±2.3%) compared to the conventional (T1: 8.0% ± 1.9%, T2: 14.5% ± 2.6%) and CRB-based (T1: 21.6% ± 4.1%, T2: 31.4% ± 4.4%) sequences. The proposed optimization scheme can be adapted to different scan settings, reference maps and optimization parameters in a straightforward manner.
https://github.com/imphys/MRF_undersampling_optimization
theory. We exploited this model to perform MRF sequence optimization by adjusting the MRF flip angle train. Numerical simulations showed that the undersampling errors can be suppressed by sequence optimization. This was further corroborated in eight in vivo scans. The results were compared to sequences with a conventionally shaped flip angle pattern and an optimized pattern based on the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRB). A sequence optimized for improved robustness against undersampling with a flip angle train of length 400 yielded significantly lower median absolute errors T1 (5.6%±2.9%) and T2 (7.9%±2.3%) compared to the conventional (T1: 8.0% ± 1.9%, T2: 14.5% ± 2.6%) and CRB-based (T1: 21.6% ± 4.1%, T2: 31.4% ± 4.4%) sequences. The proposed optimization scheme can be adapted to different scan settings, reference maps and optimization parameters in a straightforward manner.
https://github.com/imphys/MRF_undersampling_optimization
| Date made available | 20 Jun 2022 |
|---|---|
| Publisher | TU Delft - 4TU.ResearchData |
Research output
- 1 Article
-
Mitigating undersampling errors in MR fingerprinting by sequence optimization
Heesterbeek, D. G. J., Koolstra, K., van Osch, M. J. P., van Gijzen, M. B., Vos, F. M. & Nagtegaal, M. A., 2022, In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 89, 5, p. 2076-2087 12 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Open AccessFile11 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)122 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- DataSetCite