Recovery Capacity: To Build Back Better

F.H.M. van de Ven; F.L. Hooimeijer; P. Storm

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5

Recovery Capacity: To Build Back Better

F.H.M. van de Ven, F.L. Hooimeijer, P. Storm

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ambition to Build Back Better after a serious flood disaster is a complex challenge. A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary redevelopment planning process is required to reduce the flood risk and meanwhile create sustainable solutions that bring added value to society every day. General planning principles can be formulated on how to develop the physical conditions for flood resilience, while building a better place to live and work. Scoping and the charrette method are to be applied for pairing and integrating disciplinary results, to co-create Better plans in an interdisciplinary planning process. Two disaster recovery cases in Japan, after the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, and one case on Grand Bahama, after 2019 hurricane Dorian, were studied by multidisciplinary teams of students and staff to investigate in how far Building Back Better was, or is to be, realized. This was done by confronting the practice of the reconstruction process and the resulting plans with the guiding principles for the physical concepts and interdisciplinary planning approach. Practice shows that Building Back Better is suffering from a lack of integration of disciplinary solutions, guided by existing planning regulations and practices and driven by the need for flood safety and by the urgency of the reconstruction works.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Climate resilient urban areas Governance, design and development in coastal delta cities
Editors	Rutger De Graaf-Van Dinther
Place of Publication	Cham
Publisher	Palgrave MacMillan Publishers
Chapter	5
Pages	85-108
Number of pages	24
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-030-57537-3
ISBN (Print)	978-3-030-57536-6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5
Publication status	Published - 2020

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care

Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Keywords

Recovery capacity
Build Back Better
Multidisciplinary approaches
Spatial planning
Guiding principles
Flood risk reduction

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5

Recovery Capacity van de Ven et alFinal published version, 1.63 MB

Cite this

@inbook{76adc7b92967494fa6fad52555b7070c,

title = "Recovery Capacity: To Build Back Better",

abstract = "The ambition to Build Back Better after a serious flood disaster is a complex challenge. A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary redevelopment planning process is required to reduce the flood risk and meanwhile create sustainable solutions that bring added value to society every day. General planning principles can be formulated on how to develop the physical conditions for flood resilience, while building a better place to live and work. Scoping and the charrette method are to be applied for pairing and integrating disciplinary results, to co-create Better plans in an interdisciplinary planning process. Two disaster recovery cases in Japan, after the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, and one case on Grand Bahama, after 2019 hurricane Dorian, were studied by multidisciplinary teams of students and staff to investigate in how far Building Back Better was, or is to be, realized. This was done by confronting the practice of the reconstruction process and the resulting plans with the guiding principles for the physical concepts and interdisciplinary planning approach. Practice shows that Building Back Better is suffering from a lack of integration of disciplinary solutions, guided by existing planning regulations and practices and driven by the need for flood safety and by the urgency of the reconstruction works. ",

keywords = "Recovery capacity, Build Back Better, Multidisciplinary approaches, Spatial planning, Guiding principles, Flood risk reduction",

author = "{van de Ven}, F.H.M. and F.L. Hooimeijer and P. Storm",

note = "Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-57536-6",

pages = "85--108",

editor = "{De Graaf-Van Dinther}, {Rutger }",

booktitle = "Climate resilient urban areas Governance, design and development in coastal delta cities",

publisher = "Palgrave MacMillan Publishers",

}

Recovery Capacity: To Build Back Better. / van de Ven, F.H.M.; Hooimeijer, F.L.; Storm, P.
Climate resilient urban areas Governance, design and development in coastal delta cities. ed. / Rutger De Graaf-Van Dinther. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan Publishers, 2020. p. 85-108.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Recovery Capacity

T2 - To Build Back Better

AU - van de Ven, F.H.M.

AU - Hooimeijer, F.L.

AU - Storm, P.

N1 - Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The ambition to Build Back Better after a serious flood disaster is a complex challenge. A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary redevelopment planning process is required to reduce the flood risk and meanwhile create sustainable solutions that bring added value to society every day. General planning principles can be formulated on how to develop the physical conditions for flood resilience, while building a better place to live and work. Scoping and the charrette method are to be applied for pairing and integrating disciplinary results, to co-create Better plans in an interdisciplinary planning process. Two disaster recovery cases in Japan, after the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, and one case on Grand Bahama, after 2019 hurricane Dorian, were studied by multidisciplinary teams of students and staff to investigate in how far Building Back Better was, or is to be, realized. This was done by confronting the practice of the reconstruction process and the resulting plans with the guiding principles for the physical concepts and interdisciplinary planning approach. Practice shows that Building Back Better is suffering from a lack of integration of disciplinary solutions, guided by existing planning regulations and practices and driven by the need for flood safety and by the urgency of the reconstruction works.

AB - The ambition to Build Back Better after a serious flood disaster is a complex challenge. A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary redevelopment planning process is required to reduce the flood risk and meanwhile create sustainable solutions that bring added value to society every day. General planning principles can be formulated on how to develop the physical conditions for flood resilience, while building a better place to live and work. Scoping and the charrette method are to be applied for pairing and integrating disciplinary results, to co-create Better plans in an interdisciplinary planning process. Two disaster recovery cases in Japan, after the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, and one case on Grand Bahama, after 2019 hurricane Dorian, were studied by multidisciplinary teams of students and staff to investigate in how far Building Back Better was, or is to be, realized. This was done by confronting the practice of the reconstruction process and the resulting plans with the guiding principles for the physical concepts and interdisciplinary planning approach. Practice shows that Building Back Better is suffering from a lack of integration of disciplinary solutions, guided by existing planning regulations and practices and driven by the need for flood safety and by the urgency of the reconstruction works.

KW - Recovery capacity

KW - Build Back Better

KW - Multidisciplinary approaches

KW - Spatial planning

KW - Guiding principles

KW - Flood risk reduction

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-57536-6

SP - 85

EP - 108

BT - Climate resilient urban areas Governance, design and development in coastal delta cities

A2 - De Graaf-Van Dinther, Rutger

PB - Palgrave MacMillan Publishers

CY - Cham

ER -

Recovery Capacity: To Build Back Better

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this