A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities

Yunfeng Yang, Genserik Reniers, Guohua Chen*, Floris Goerlandt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)


Although there is a growing field of research focusing on university laboratory safety, accidents in such contexts still occur relatively frequently. Therefore, it is significant to summarize current research status and gaps, and to propose future research directions in the field of university laboratory safety. In this paper, a bibliometric analysis method was applied to gain an overall view of the developments, focus areas, and trends in this field of safety research. A total of 219 scientific publications on university laboratory safety were identified and screened from the database of Web of Science, covering 44 countries or regions, 254 research institutions, 575 authors, 126 publication sources, and 70 subject categories. Bibliometric data such as annual growth trend and distribution of subject categories were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The most productive and influential countries, institutions, authors, and their cooperation networks were identified from co-citation maps created by VOSviewer. Further analysis was carried out to find out the core publications and publication sources in this field. Insights in the focus areas and research topics over time were obtained through terms co-occurrence analysis. The results indicate that university laboratory safety is a highly multidisciplinary research field. However, it is still a young discipline and belongs to the minority research field when compared with other safety domains. Several avenues for future research are identified to advance and make progress in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-24
Number of pages11
JournalSafety Science
Publication statusPublished - 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this