A commentary on “how to interpret expert judgment assessments of twenty-first century sea-level rise” by Hylke de Vries and Roderik SW van de Wal

J.L. Bamber, W.P. Aspinall, R.M. Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We clarify key aspects of the evaluation, by de Vries and van de Wal (2015), of our expert elicitation paper on the contributions of ice sheet melting to sea level rise due to future global temperature rise scenarios (Bamber and Aspinall 2013), and extend the conversation with further analysis of their proposed approach for combining expert uncertainty judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-328
Number of pages8
JournalClimatic Change
Volume137
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Statistical Accuracy
  • Expert Judgment
  • Expert Elicitation
  • Global Temperature Rise
  • Calibration Variable

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A commentary on “how to interpret expert judgment assessments of twenty-first century sea-level rise” by Hylke de Vries and Roderik SW van de Wal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this