A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones

Martijn Janssen; Rashidah M. Pilus; Pacelli L.J. Zitha

doi:10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3

A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones

Martijn Janssen, Rashidah M. Pilus, Pacelli L.J. Zitha

Reservoir Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A laboratory study of principal immiscible gas flooding schemes is reported. Very well-controlled experiments on continuous gas injection, water-alternating-gas (WAG) and alkaline–surfactant–foam (ASF) flooding were conducted. The merits of WAG and ASF compared to continuous gas injection were examined. The impact of ultra-low oil–water (o/w) interfacial tension (IFT), an essential feature of the ASF scheme along with foaming, on oil mobilisation and displacement of residual oil to waterflood was also assessed. Incremental oil recoveries and related displacement mechanisms by ASF and WAG compared to continuous gas injection were investigated by conducting CT-scanned core-flood experiments using n-hexadecane and Bentheimer sandstone cores. Ultimate oil recoveries for WAG and ASF at under-optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10⁻¹ mN/m) were found to be similar [60 ± 5% of the oil initially in place (OIIP)]. However, ultimate oil recovery for ASF at (near-)optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10⁻² mN/m) reached 74 ± 8% of the OIIP. Results support the idea that WAG increases oil recovery over continuous gas injection by drastically increasing the trapped gas saturation at the end of the first few WAG cycles. ASF flooding was able to enhance oil recovery over WAG by effectively lowering o/w IFT (< 10⁻¹ mN/m) for oil mobilisation. ASF at (near-)optimum salinity increased clean oil fraction in the production stream over under-optimum salinity ASF.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	101–134
Number of pages	34
Journal	Transport in Porous Media
Volume	131 (2020)
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

Alkaline
Enhanced oil recovery
Foam
Immiscible gas injection
Oil
Surfactant
Water-alternating-gas

Access to Document

10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3

revised text for PUREAccepted author manuscript, 3.02 MB

Cite this

@article{68cd30aca3d24187b9aa3dc0502d2199,

title = "A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones",

abstract = "A laboratory study of principal immiscible gas flooding schemes is reported. Very well-controlled experiments on continuous gas injection, water-alternating-gas (WAG) and alkaline–surfactant–foam (ASF) flooding were conducted. The merits of WAG and ASF compared to continuous gas injection were examined. The impact of ultra-low oil–water (o/w) interfacial tension (IFT), an essential feature of the ASF scheme along with foaming, on oil mobilisation and displacement of residual oil to waterflood was also assessed. Incremental oil recoveries and related displacement mechanisms by ASF and WAG compared to continuous gas injection were investigated by conducting CT-scanned core-flood experiments using n-hexadecane and Bentheimer sandstone cores. Ultimate oil recoveries for WAG and ASF at under-optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−1 mN/m) were found to be similar [60 ± 5% of the oil initially in place (OIIP)]. However, ultimate oil recovery for ASF at (near-)optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−2 mN/m) reached 74 ± 8% of the OIIP. Results support the idea that WAG increases oil recovery over continuous gas injection by drastically increasing the trapped gas saturation at the end of the first few WAG cycles. ASF flooding was able to enhance oil recovery over WAG by effectively lowering o/w IFT (< 10−1 mN/m) for oil mobilisation. ASF at (near-)optimum salinity increased clean oil fraction in the production stream over under-optimum salinity ASF.",

keywords = "Alkaline, Enhanced oil recovery, Foam, Immiscible gas injection, Oil, Surfactant, Water-alternating-gas",

author = "Martijn Janssen and Pilus, {Rashidah M.} and Zitha, {Pacelli L.J.}",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3",

language = "English",

volume = "131 (2020)",

pages = "101–134",

journal = "Transport in Porous Media",

issn = "0169-3913",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones

AU - Janssen, Martijn

AU - Pilus, Rashidah M.

AU - Zitha, Pacelli L.J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A laboratory study of principal immiscible gas flooding schemes is reported. Very well-controlled experiments on continuous gas injection, water-alternating-gas (WAG) and alkaline–surfactant–foam (ASF) flooding were conducted. The merits of WAG and ASF compared to continuous gas injection were examined. The impact of ultra-low oil–water (o/w) interfacial tension (IFT), an essential feature of the ASF scheme along with foaming, on oil mobilisation and displacement of residual oil to waterflood was also assessed. Incremental oil recoveries and related displacement mechanisms by ASF and WAG compared to continuous gas injection were investigated by conducting CT-scanned core-flood experiments using n-hexadecane and Bentheimer sandstone cores. Ultimate oil recoveries for WAG and ASF at under-optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−1 mN/m) were found to be similar [60 ± 5% of the oil initially in place (OIIP)]. However, ultimate oil recovery for ASF at (near-)optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−2 mN/m) reached 74 ± 8% of the OIIP. Results support the idea that WAG increases oil recovery over continuous gas injection by drastically increasing the trapped gas saturation at the end of the first few WAG cycles. ASF flooding was able to enhance oil recovery over WAG by effectively lowering o/w IFT (< 10−1 mN/m) for oil mobilisation. ASF at (near-)optimum salinity increased clean oil fraction in the production stream over under-optimum salinity ASF.

AB - A laboratory study of principal immiscible gas flooding schemes is reported. Very well-controlled experiments on continuous gas injection, water-alternating-gas (WAG) and alkaline–surfactant–foam (ASF) flooding were conducted. The merits of WAG and ASF compared to continuous gas injection were examined. The impact of ultra-low oil–water (o/w) interfacial tension (IFT), an essential feature of the ASF scheme along with foaming, on oil mobilisation and displacement of residual oil to waterflood was also assessed. Incremental oil recoveries and related displacement mechanisms by ASF and WAG compared to continuous gas injection were investigated by conducting CT-scanned core-flood experiments using n-hexadecane and Bentheimer sandstone cores. Ultimate oil recoveries for WAG and ASF at under-optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−1 mN/m) were found to be similar [60 ± 5% of the oil initially in place (OIIP)]. However, ultimate oil recovery for ASF at (near-)optimum salinity (o/w IFT of 10−2 mN/m) reached 74 ± 8% of the OIIP. Results support the idea that WAG increases oil recovery over continuous gas injection by drastically increasing the trapped gas saturation at the end of the first few WAG cycles. ASF flooding was able to enhance oil recovery over WAG by effectively lowering o/w IFT (< 10−1 mN/m) for oil mobilisation. ASF at (near-)optimum salinity increased clean oil fraction in the production stream over under-optimum salinity ASF.

KW - Alkaline

KW - Enhanced oil recovery

KW - Foam

KW - Immiscible gas injection

KW - Oil

KW - Surfactant

KW - Water-alternating-gas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059583139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3

DO - 10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3

M3 - Article

SN - 0169-3913

VL - 131 (2020)

SP - 101

EP - 134

JO - Transport in Porous Media

JF - Transport in Porous Media

IS - 1

ER -

A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this