A conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless 4P vehicles

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

408 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper represents a synthesis of existing empirical acceptance studies on automated driving and scientific literature on technology acceptance. The objective of this paper is to study user acceptance of driverless vehicles that fall into SAE level 4, as they operate within the constraints of dedicated infrastructure. The review indicates that previous acceptance studies on automated driving are skewed towards car users, creating a need for targeted acceptance studies, including users of public transport. For obvious reasons previous studies targeted respondents who had not experienced driverless vehicles. As driverless vehicle are currently being demonstrated in pilot projects, we can now start to investigate their acceptance by users inside and outside of such vehicles. Addressing the multidimensional nature of acceptance, we develop a conceptual model that integrates a holistic and comprehensive set of variables to explain, predict and improve user acceptance of driverless vehicles. It links two dominant models from the technology acceptance management literature, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Technology Use (UTAUT) and the Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance-Framework (PAD), with a number of external variables that are divided into system-specific, user and contextual characteristics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers
Place of PublicationWashington, DC, USA
PublisherTransportation Research Board (TRB)
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventTransportation Research Board 95th annual meeting - Washington, United States
Duration: 10 Jan 201614 Jan 2016
Conference number: 95

Conference

ConferenceTransportation Research Board 95th annual meeting
Abbreviated titleTRB 95
CountryUnited States
CityWashington
Period10/01/1614/01/16

Keywords

  • acceptance
  • driverless vehicles
  • human factors
  • full automation
  • real scenarios
  • test rides

Cite this