A critique of The Vastness of Natural Languages by Langendoen and Postal

Research output: Working paper/PreprintWorking paperScientific

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper looks at an argument in 'On the vastness of Natural Languages' by D. T. Langendoen and P. M. Postal.

The conclusion is that it does not pass mathematical muster.

The salient points are

saying "language rules impose no size limits" does not mean that one can say "there are arbitrarily large entities"; it simply means that one does not avail oneself of the former assumption, the latter assumption is just that: an assumption (or better axiom), not a consequence of not using the former

the existence proof for co-ordinate projections is mathematically unsound; it establishes that "Tom and Jerry" is a sentence built from the set {Laurel, Hardy}

the proof of the main result uses the assumption "there are projections of any given cardinality"; this assumption is equivalent to the conclusion of the theorem and this reduces the main theorem to a trivial tautology
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critique of The Vastness of Natural Languages by Langendoen and Postal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this