TY - JOUR
T1 - A planning approach for online adaptive proton therapy to cope with cone beam computed tomography inaccuracies
AU - Oud, Michelle
AU - Breedveld, Sebastiaan
AU - Ng Wei Siang, Kelvin
AU - Cassetta, Roberto
AU - Habraken, Steven
AU - Perkó, Zoltán
AU - Heijmen, Ben
AU - Hoogeman, Mischa
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background and purpose: In online-adaptive proton therapy planning based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), CT number errors can pose challenges. We propose an approach for coping with CT number uncertainties by increasing range robustness settings (RRS) in online-adaptive planning. This was compared to our trigger-based offline (TB-Offline) adaptive approach, and to daily replanning using in-room CT-on-rails (CTOR). Material and methods: For 23 head-and-neck cancer patients, a CTOR and CBCT were acquired in a single fraction. CTOR contours were copied rigidly onto the CBCT. CBCT-based plans were generated with 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 % RRS, each with 1 mm setup-RS, followed by a forward dose calculation on the reference CTOR. This was compared to dose distributions from our TB-Offline approach (3 mm/3% SRS/RRS), also recomputed on the CTOR. Coverage (voxelwise-minimum) of the primary clinical target volume (CTV7000) and elective lymph nodes (CTV5425) and grade ≥ II normal tissue complication probabilities were compared between strategies. Results: When going from RRS = 3 % to RRS = 10 %, the population 90th percentiles of CTV5425 V94% improved from 89.6 % to 96.4 %, and CTV7000 V94% from 92.8 % to 96.4 %. Substantial coverage loss (V94%<95 %) with CBCT-based online adaptive and RRS = 10 % was observed in 1/23 evaluated patients for CTV7000 and 2/23 for CTV5425. This was an improvement compared to 3/23 and 4/23 with TB-Offline. Moreover, for RRS = 10 % the average risk of xerostomia improved by 2.4 percentage point compared to TB-Offline. Conclusions: Robust optimization with increased range robustness settings effectively mitigated dose degradation from CT number errors in CBCT-based online-adaptive proton therapy.
AB - Background and purpose: In online-adaptive proton therapy planning based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), CT number errors can pose challenges. We propose an approach for coping with CT number uncertainties by increasing range robustness settings (RRS) in online-adaptive planning. This was compared to our trigger-based offline (TB-Offline) adaptive approach, and to daily replanning using in-room CT-on-rails (CTOR). Material and methods: For 23 head-and-neck cancer patients, a CTOR and CBCT were acquired in a single fraction. CTOR contours were copied rigidly onto the CBCT. CBCT-based plans were generated with 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 % RRS, each with 1 mm setup-RS, followed by a forward dose calculation on the reference CTOR. This was compared to dose distributions from our TB-Offline approach (3 mm/3% SRS/RRS), also recomputed on the CTOR. Coverage (voxelwise-minimum) of the primary clinical target volume (CTV7000) and elective lymph nodes (CTV5425) and grade ≥ II normal tissue complication probabilities were compared between strategies. Results: When going from RRS = 3 % to RRS = 10 %, the population 90th percentiles of CTV5425 V94% improved from 89.6 % to 96.4 %, and CTV7000 V94% from 92.8 % to 96.4 %. Substantial coverage loss (V94%<95 %) with CBCT-based online adaptive and RRS = 10 % was observed in 1/23 evaluated patients for CTV7000 and 2/23 for CTV5425. This was an improvement compared to 3/23 and 4/23 with TB-Offline. Moreover, for RRS = 10 % the average risk of xerostomia improved by 2.4 percentage point compared to TB-Offline. Conclusions: Robust optimization with increased range robustness settings effectively mitigated dose degradation from CT number errors in CBCT-based online-adaptive proton therapy.
KW - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
KW - head-and-neck cancer
KW - in-room CT
KW - intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT)
KW - inter-fraction motion
KW - offline adaptive radiotherapy
KW - online adaptive radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000533577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100752
DO - 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100752
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000533577
SN - 2405-6316
VL - 34
JO - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
JF - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100752
ER -