A Rejoinder

Servaas Storm

doi:10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249

A Rejoinder

Servaas Storm^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Economics of Technology and Innovation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a rejoinder to the stimulating comments by David Colander, Drucilla Barker and Jeronim Capaldo on my critique of the non-progressive macroeconomic DSGE research paradigm. The three comments expand my arguments and underscore the need for a drastic change in the mainstream approach to macroeconomics.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	111-115
Number of pages	5
Journal	International Journal of Political Economy
Volume	50
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249
Publication status	Published - 2021

Keywords

CGE models
empirical fidelity
macroeconomics
New Keynesian DSGE models

Access to Document

10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249

A RejoinderFinal published version, 822 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{a1096e54c14147caae4fbf3c0f9cd4ac,

title = "A Rejoinder",

abstract = "This is a rejoinder to the stimulating comments by David Colander, Drucilla Barker and Jeronim Capaldo on my critique of the non-progressive macroeconomic DSGE research paradigm. The three comments expand my arguments and underscore the need for a drastic change in the mainstream approach to macroeconomics.",

keywords = "CGE models, empirical fidelity, macroeconomics, New Keynesian DSGE models",

author = "Servaas Storm",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "111--115",

journal = "International Journal of Political Economy",

issn = "1558-0970",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Rejoinder

AU - Storm, Servaas

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This is a rejoinder to the stimulating comments by David Colander, Drucilla Barker and Jeronim Capaldo on my critique of the non-progressive macroeconomic DSGE research paradigm. The three comments expand my arguments and underscore the need for a drastic change in the mainstream approach to macroeconomics.

AB - This is a rejoinder to the stimulating comments by David Colander, Drucilla Barker and Jeronim Capaldo on my critique of the non-progressive macroeconomic DSGE research paradigm. The three comments expand my arguments and underscore the need for a drastic change in the mainstream approach to macroeconomics.

KW - CGE models

KW - empirical fidelity

KW - macroeconomics

KW - New Keynesian DSGE models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112388455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249

DO - 10.1080/08911916.2021.1945249

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85112388455

SN - 1558-0970

VL - 50

SP - 111

EP - 115

JO - International Journal of Political Economy

JF - International Journal of Political Economy

IS - 2

ER -

A Rejoinder

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this