Abstract
In this chapter we sketch the opportunities and challenges of designing products and materials that fit a circular economy, with a specific focus on bio-based plastics. We show that the often-used “butterfly” model of the circular economy, which distinguishes between a biocycle and a technocycle, is not very useful when we consider bio-based plastics from a design perspective. This leads us to propose an alternative framing of the circular economy with a limited number of recovery pathways. Based on this framing, we argue that the choice of a particular bio-based plastic always needs to be done on the basis of its properties as well as its recovery and end-of-life pathways, if we want to support a circular and sustainable economy. This is currently not a standard procedure in design. In addition, we argue that one of the main challenges we currently face is to educate designers about bio-based materials in all their complexity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Materials Experience 2 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Expanding Territories of Materials and Design |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Pages | 193-206 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-0-12819244-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Bio-based plastic
- Biodegradation
- Circular economy
- Design
- Recovery
