"A Steadying Hand": Ascribing Speech Acts to Users of Predictive Speech Assistive Technologies

Stephen Rainey, Hannah Maslen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Neuroprosthetic speech technologies are in development for patients suffering profound paralysis, such as can result from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These patients would be unable to speak without intervention, but with neurotechnology can be offered the chance to communicate. The nature of the technology introduces a neuroprosthesis that mediates neural activity to generate synthesised speech. How word prediction coheres with speaker intentions requires scrutiny. Some future forms of prostheses, using statistical language models to predict word patterns, could be thought of as participating with communicative intent - not merely channelling it. Concepts relating to vicarious liability, may serve to clarify these issues. This column shows how technology might interact with speaker intent in cases of delegated action, and how it should be seen as participating in the implementation of user "instructions".
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-53
JournalJournal of Law & Medicine
Volume26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • neurotechnology
  • language
  • synthesised speech
  • agency
  • vicarious liability
  • delegation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"A Steadying Hand": Ascribing Speech Acts to Users of Predictive Speech Assistive Technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this