A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory

Ricardo Matheus, Marijn Janssen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

122 Citations (SciVal)
352 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The opening of data has been credited for improving transparency and for providing a window on government functioning. Although this relationship is intuitively apparent, it is in fact complex and the mere opening of data might not actually yield transparency. In this paper, a comprehensive model of determinants that enable or impede transparency enabled by open government data and the expected effects have been derived by surveying public administration and information systems literature. Public administration literature tends to be focused on factors such as participation and trust, whereas information systems literature focuses on factors such as user interface, user experience, and data quality. Digital government literature attempts to bridge these elements. The Window Theory is introduced, in order to unify existing models by integrating a broad range of factors within a single model. The Window Theory can be used to develop context-dependent models that are both comprehensive and parsimonious.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-534
Number of pages32
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • accountability
  • anti-corruption
  • digital government
  • disclosure
  • open data
  • open government
  • open government data
  • participation
  • transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this