Aeration performances of a gabion stepped weir with and without capping

Davide Wuthrich, Hubert Chanson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The stepped spillway design has been used for more than 3,300 years. A simple structure is the gabion stepped weir. A laboratory study was performed herein in a large size facility. Three gabion stepped weirs were tested with and without capping, as well as a flat impervious stepped configuration. For each configuration, detailed air–water flow measurements were conducted systematically for a range of discharges. The observations highlighted the seepage flow through the gabions and the interactions between seepage and overflow. The air–water flow properties showed that the air concentration, bubble count rate and specific interface data presented lower quantitative values in the gabion stepped weir, compared to those on the impervious stepped chute, while higher velocities were measured at the downstream end of the gabion stepped chute. The re-oxygenation rate was deduced from the integration of the mass transfer equation using air–water interfacial area and velocity measurements. The aeration performances of the gabion stepped weir were lesser than on the flat impervious stepped chute, but for the lowest discharge. For the two configurations with step capping, the resulting flow properties were close to those on the impervious stepped configuration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)711-730
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aeration
  • Air–water interfacial flow properties
  • Gabion stepped weirs
  • Impervious step capping
  • Physical modelling
  • Re-oxygenation
  • Seepage flow
  • Stepped spillways

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aeration performances of a gabion stepped weir with and without capping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this