Abstract
Purpose: One of the key challenges in the servitization of companies is developing the required capabilities to deliver advanced services. A strategy to tackle this challenge is to collaborate with a service-providing partner, that has complimentary capabilities. In such collaboration, though, the people
involved have to serve their corporate goals and have different organisational and professional backgrounds. The differences challenge the collaboration. In practice, people struggle to deal with the critical situations that arise when these differences affect the collaboration. The literature’s recommendations on what to do in those situations show great variety and can even be contradictory.
This paper presents a repertoire of actions people can take in the critical situations they experience when collaborating with a service-provider.
Design/methodology/approach: Based on an earlier study into critical situations in the collaboration in those networks, we developed an experiment to study what people do in those situations. We asked thirty managers with experience in such collaborations what they would do in the fifteen situations we
provided.
Findings: Across the situations presented in the simulation experiment, recurring themes emerged in the
activities people undertook and further analysis resulted in a repertoire of actions that servitizing
collaborators can take to act upon the critical situations in servitization they experience while
collaborating with service providers.
Originality/Value: This paper provides practitioners in servitization collaboration with a hands-on action
repertoire. This repertoire can be further developed into a general tool for collaboration in servitization
to resolve collaborative issues as they arise.
involved have to serve their corporate goals and have different organisational and professional backgrounds. The differences challenge the collaboration. In practice, people struggle to deal with the critical situations that arise when these differences affect the collaboration. The literature’s recommendations on what to do in those situations show great variety and can even be contradictory.
This paper presents a repertoire of actions people can take in the critical situations they experience when collaborating with a service-provider.
Design/methodology/approach: Based on an earlier study into critical situations in the collaboration in those networks, we developed an experiment to study what people do in those situations. We asked thirty managers with experience in such collaborations what they would do in the fifteen situations we
provided.
Findings: Across the situations presented in the simulation experiment, recurring themes emerged in the
activities people undertook and further analysis resulted in a repertoire of actions that servitizing
collaborators can take to act upon the critical situations in servitization they experience while
collaborating with service providers.
Originality/Value: This paper provides practitioners in servitization collaboration with a hands-on action
repertoire. This repertoire can be further developed into a general tool for collaboration in servitization
to resolve collaborative issues as they arise.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Servitization: Shift, Transform, Grow |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the Spring Servitization Conference |
Editors | Tim Baines, Jamie Burton, Dave Harrison, Judy Zolkiewski |
Place of Publication | Manchester |
Publisher | Aston Business School |
Pages | 31-39 |
Number of pages | 9 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-85449-403-0 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | The Spring Servitization Conference (SSC16): Shift, Extend and Transorm - Manchester, United Kingdom Duration: 16 May 2016 → 17 May 2016 |
Conference
Conference | The Spring Servitization Conference (SSC16) |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Manchester |
Period | 16/05/16 → 17/05/16 |
Keywords
- collaboration
- networks
- critical situations
- action repertoire