Annotated Portfolios as a Method to Analyse Interviews

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

274 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores the use of annotated portfolios as a method to support the qualitative analysis of interview data about design projects. Annotated portfolios have so far been used to support artefacts with text in order to discuss them in the context of ‘research through design’ In this paper, we interpret the five-step method of McCracken and relate it to annotated portfolios to analyse interviews. We use a case study on design projects related to 3D printing and sustainability to illustrate the process. Five designers were interviewed to obtain a deeper understanding of the role of Additive Manufacturing in practice. These interviews were analysed in a visual process with annotated portfolios. The use of annotated portfolios is considered a meaningful approach to analyse interviews, because it leads to a more transparent analysis process: The visuals are rich in information, bring clarity to the data for interpretation and pattern finding and make this stage insightful for discussion with peers.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of DRS 2018
EditorsC. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherDesign Research Society
Pages1148-1158
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)978-1-912294-18-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventDRS 2018: Design as a catalyst for change - Limerick, Ireland
Duration: 25 Jun 201828 Jun 2018

Publication series

NameProceedings of DRS
PublisherDesign Research Society
Volume3
ISSN (Print)2398-3132

Conference

ConferenceDRS 2018
CountryIreland
CityLimerick
Period25/06/1828/06/18

Keywords

  • annotated portfolios
  • visual analysis of interviews
  • research through design
  • circular economy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Annotated Portfolios as a Method to Analyse Interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this