Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing

J. Rueda, S. Segers, J. Hopster, K. Kudlek, B. Liedo, S. Marchiori, J. Danaher*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Considering public moral attitudes is a hallmark of the anticipatory governance of emerging biotechnologies, such as heritable human genome editing. However, such anticipatory governance often overlooks that future morality is open to change and that future generations may perform different moral assessments on the very biotechnologies we are trying to govern in the present. In this article, we identify an ‘anticipatory gap’ that has not been sufficiently addressed in the discussion on the public governance of heritable genome editing, namely, uncertainty about the moral visions of future generations about the emerging applications that we are currently attempting to govern now. This paper motivates the relevance of this anticipatory gap, identifying the challenges it generates and offering various recommendations so that moral uncertainty does not lead to governance paralysis with regard to human germline genome editing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this