Aortic valve neocuspidization and bioprosthetic valves: Evaluating turbulence haemodynamics

Emily Louise Manchester*, Selene Pirola, Sergio Pirola, Giorgio Mastroiacovo, Gianluca Polvani, Gianluca Pontone, Xiao Yun Xu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aortic valve disease is often treated with bioprosthetic valves. An alternative treatment is aortic valve neocuspidization which is a relatively new reparative procedure whereby the three aortic cusps are replaced with patient pericardium or bovine tissues. Recent research indicates that aortic blood flow is disturbed, and turbulence effects have yet to be evaluated in either bioprosthetic or aortic valve neocuspidization valve types in patient-specific settings. The aim of this study is to better understand turbulence production in the aorta and evaluate its effects on laminar and turbulent wall shear stress. Four patients with aortic valve disease were treated with either bioprosthetic valves (n=2) or aortic valve neocuspidization valvular repair (n=2). Aortic geometries were segmented from magnetic resonance images (MRI), and 4D flow MRI was used to derive physiological inlet and outlet boundary conditions. Pulsatile large-eddy simulations were performed to capture the full range of laminar, transitional and turbulence characteristics in the aorta. Turbulence was produced in all aortas with highest levels occurring during systolic deceleration. In the ascending aorta, turbulence production is attributed to a combination of valvular skew, valvular eccentricity, and ascending aortic dilation. In the proximal descending thoracic aorta, turbulence production is dependent on the type of arch-descending aorta connection (e.g., a narrowing or sharp bend) which induces flow separation. Laminar and turbulent wall shear stresses are of similar magnitude throughout late systolic deceleration and diastole, although turbulent wall shear stress magnitudes exceed laminar wall shear stresses between 27.3% and 61.1% of the cardiac cycle. This emphasises the significance of including turbulent wall shear stress to improve our comprehension of progressive arterial wall diseases. The findings of this study recommend that aortic valve treatments should prioritise minimising valvular eccentricity and skew in order to mitigate turbulence generation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108123
Number of pages12
JournalComputers in Biology and Medicine
Volume171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Funding

EM was supported by a PhD scholarship through the EPSRC Doctoral Training Partnership grant to Imperial College London ( EP/R512 540/1 ). This work used the Cirrus UK National Tier-2 HPC Service at EPCC ( http://www.cirrus.ac.uk ) funded by the University of Edinburgh and EPSRC ( EP/P020267/1 ).

Keywords

  • Aortic valve neocuspidization
  • Aortic valve replacement
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Blood flow
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Haemodynamics
  • Large-eddy simulation
  • Ozaki procedure
  • Turbulence
  • Wall shear stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aortic valve neocuspidization and bioprosthetic valves: Evaluating turbulence haemodynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this