Are we moving fast enough? The energy renovation rate of the Dutch non-profit housing using the national energy labelling database

Faidra Filippidou, Nico Nieboer, Henk Visscher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)
    51 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The existing housing stock plays a major role in meeting the energy saving targets set in the Netherlands as well as in the EU. Existing buildings account for 38% of the final energy consumption in the European Union (EU), and they are responsible for 36% of the CO2 emissions. Energy renovations in dwellings offer unique opportunities to reduce both energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. In this article, the renovation rates for the non-profit housing stock of the Netherlands are presented, based on the changes in the energy performance of 856,252 dwellings for the period of 2010–2014. The data necessary are drawn from a monitoring system that contains information about the energy performance of approximately 60% of all dwellings in the sector. The method used follows the changes of the dwellings’ physical properties and reported energy performance. The results show that although many energy improvements have been realized, they result in small changes of the energy efficiency of the dwellings. Deep energy renovation rates are very low. If this pace continues, the progress is too little to reach national and international policy targets. The renovation rates are not high enough and the trends seem difficult to reach.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)488-498
    JournalEnergy Policy
    Volume109
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Big data
    • Energy efficiency
    • Housing
    • Monitoring
    • Renovation rate
    • The Netherlands

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Are we moving fast enough? The energy renovation rate of the Dutch non-profit housing using the national energy labelling database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this