TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence as a New Research Ally?
T2 - Performing AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Health Economics
AU - van Mossel, Sietse
AU - Oude-Wolcherink, Martijn Johan
AU - de Feria Cardet, Rafael Emilio
AU - de Geus-Oei, Lioe Fee
AU - Vriens, Dennis
AU - Koffijberg, Hendrik
AU - Saing, Sopany
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are fundamental for aggregating published evidence, identifying knowledge gaps and informing health economic evaluations, especially in the field of novel diagnostics where randomised controlled trials are commonly absent [1]. The global publishing output within the field of novel diagnostics is increasing rapidly owing to increasing efforts towards precision medicine. Simultaneously, the global publishing output within the field of health economics is increasing rapidly owing to increasing efforts towards value-based healthcare and present budget constraints. The number of publications focussing on the health economic impact of diagnostics almost doubled from 86,244 in 2010 to 152,404 in 2025 (PubMed search using MeSH terms ‘Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures’ and ‘Health Care Economics and Organizations’). Consequently, the workload of performing SLRs is increasing as the number of articles that requires screening grows larger. The average time to complete an SLR is over 15 months, while the proportion of truly relevant articles for data extraction may be as low as 1% of the total search results [2]. The high workload may reduce researchers’ willingness to conduct an SLR or may lead to search strategies that are too narrow when prioritising time constraints over review quality. Moreover, it may render an SLR outdated by the time it is published.
AB - Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are fundamental for aggregating published evidence, identifying knowledge gaps and informing health economic evaluations, especially in the field of novel diagnostics where randomised controlled trials are commonly absent [1]. The global publishing output within the field of novel diagnostics is increasing rapidly owing to increasing efforts towards precision medicine. Simultaneously, the global publishing output within the field of health economics is increasing rapidly owing to increasing efforts towards value-based healthcare and present budget constraints. The number of publications focussing on the health economic impact of diagnostics almost doubled from 86,244 in 2010 to 152,404 in 2025 (PubMed search using MeSH terms ‘Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures’ and ‘Health Care Economics and Organizations’). Consequently, the workload of performing SLRs is increasing as the number of articles that requires screening grows larger. The average time to complete an SLR is over 15 months, while the proportion of truly relevant articles for data extraction may be as low as 1% of the total search results [2]. The high workload may reduce researchers’ willingness to conduct an SLR or may lead to search strategies that are too narrow when prioritising time constraints over review quality. Moreover, it may render an SLR outdated by the time it is published.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002211573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40273-025-01481-4
DO - 10.1007/s40273-025-01481-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002211573
SN - 1170-7690
VL - 43
SP - 647
EP - 650
JO - PharmacoEconomics
JF - PharmacoEconomics
IS - 6
M1 - e072254
ER -