Assessing System-Wide Safety Readiness for Successful Human–Robot Collaboration Adoption

Nicole Berx*, Arie Adriaensen, Wilm Decré, Liliane Pintelon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite their undisputed potential, the uptake of collaborative robots remains below expectations. Collaborative robots (cobots) are used differently from conventional industrial robots. The current safety focus of collaborative workspaces is predominantly on the technological design; additional factors also need to be considered to cope with the emerging risks associated with complex systems. Cobot technologies are characterized by an inherent tradeoff between safety and efficiency. They introduce new, emergent risks to organizations and can create psychosocial impacts on workers. This leads to a confusing body of information and an apparent contradiction about cobot safety. Combined with a lack of safety knowledge, this impedes the introduction of cobots. A multi-step methodology was used, including a literature review and conceptual modeling. This article argues for the need for a system-wide safety awareness readiness assessment in the consideration phase of cobot implementation to alleviate the knowledge deficit and confusion. This work will benefit both researchers and practitioners. In addition, it defends the appropriateness of a maturity grid model for a readiness assessment tool. The building blocks for an easy-to-use and practically applicable tool are proposed, as well as an agenda for the next steps.
Original languageEnglish
Article number48
JournalSafety
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adoption
  • collaborative robots
  • maturity models
  • safety risk readiness
  • socio-technical

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing System-Wide Safety Readiness for Successful Human–Robot Collaboration Adoption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this