Bacteriophage DNA glucosylation impairs target DNA binding by type I and II but not by type V CRISPR–Cas effector complexes

Marnix Vlot, Joep Houkes, Silke J.A. Lochs, Daan C. Swarts, Peiyuan Zheng, Tim Kunne, Prarthana Mohanraju, Carolin Anders, Martin Jinek, John Van Der Oost, Mark J. Dickman, Stan J.J. Brouns*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)
68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Prokaryotes encode various host defense systems that provide protection against mobile genetic elements. Restriction–modification (R–M) and CRISPR–Cas systems mediate host defense by sequence specific targeting of invasive DNA. T-even bacteriophages employ covalent modifications of nucleobases to avoid binding and therefore cleavage of their DNA by restriction endonucleases. Here, we describe that DNA glucosylation of bacteriophage genomes affects interference of some but not all CRISPR–Cas systems. We show that glucosyl modification of 5-hydroxymethylated cytosines in the DNA of bacteriophage T4 interferes with type I-E and type II-A CRISPR–Cas systems by lowering the affinity of the Cascade and Cas9–crRNA complexes for their target DNA. On the contrary, the type V-A nuclease Cas12a (also known as Cpf1) is not impaired in binding and cleavage of glucosylated target DNA, likely due to a more open structural architecture of the protein. Our results suggest that CRISPR–Cas systems have contributed to the selective pressure on phages to develop more generic solutions to escape sequence specific host defense systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-885
Number of pages13
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bacteriophage DNA glucosylation impairs target DNA binding by type I and II but not by type V CRISPR–Cas effector complexes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this