Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bias in borehole image fracture interpretation - comparing five independent interpretations of one image log

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

Borehole images are commonly used to characterize fractures in the subsurface, but interpretations however might be prone to interpreter bias. In this study, we compare five independent interpretations of a single borehole image log from the Geneva Basin, and assess the agreement/disagreement among interpreters regarding fracture frequency and orientation. We then relate the agreement/disagreement with the geology encountered by the borehole and the technical quality of the imagelog. The results show that certain lithologies such as bioclastic limestone favour consistent frequency interpretations. In general, there is little agreement on fracture orientation, but the highest agreement is where the dip of bedding surfaces is low (
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication87th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition
PublisherEuropean Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Number of pages5
Volume2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026
Event87th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition - Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jun 2026 → 11 Jun 2026
https://eageannual.org/eage-annual-2026/

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Electronic)2214-4609

Conference

Conference87th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition
Abbreviated titleEAGE 2026
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityAberdeen
Period8/06/26 → 11/06/26
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bias in borehole image fracture interpretation - comparing five independent interpretations of one image log'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this