TY - JOUR
T1 - Bottlenecks in establishing the environmental impact of bio-based plastics
T2 - A case study of bio-based polyethylene and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate
AU - Ritzen, Linda
AU - Sprecher, Benjamin
AU - Bakker, Conny
AU - Balkenende, Ruud
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.
AB - Bio-based plastics hold the potential to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics industry because they are based on renewable resources instead of petrochemicals. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bio-based plastics use varied methodologies and have shown large discrepancies, making it difficult to compare outcomes. This article presents an LCA of 31 scenarios for bio-based high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based on life cycle inventories from literature. The scenarios included various biomass types, production locations and chemical conversion processes. Even the methodologically consistent LCAs yielded large discrepancies in outcomes. Conducting methodologically consistent replications allows us to study the factors that affect the environmental impact of bio-based plastics. Six key factors that contribute to variations were identified. The limited public information and limited scoping of the studied LCAs resulted in life cycle inventories that did not cover all relevant impact categories. A harmonised scope and life cycle impact assessment with more transparent reporting is therefore needed to improve the reliability of bio-based plastic LCAs in the future. A section of the studied LCAs did provide sufficient information to study the effects of bio-based plastic production processes, which yielded the other four factors: biomass type, processing, electricity, and heat. Understanding the factors from practice provides additional information about how bio-based plastics should be developed and how their LCAs should be interpreted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219442286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145126
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219442286
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 496
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 145126
ER -