Abstract
This paper criticizes traditional models of urban–regional expansion, which depart from monocentric ideals of urban core and ring. The original spatial-cycle model (SCM) suggests repeating stages of urbanization, suburbanization, disurbanization and re-urbanization. We reconceptualize the relations between core(s) and ring(s) to test the formation of urban regions under mono-, multi- and polycentric trajectories. The analysis employs local population data in functional urban regions in Finland, Austria and the Netherlands, three countries with different urbanization patterns, for the period 1961–2011. Results suggest a ‘break of the cycle’ in polycentric regions and a shift towards a different period, which we call ‘syncurbanization’.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-35 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Regional Studies |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- demography
- monocentricity
- polycentricity
- polyhinterland
- population change
- Van den berg
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking with the spatial-cycle model: the shift towards ‘syncurbanization’ in polycentric urban regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver