Building response to tunnelling- and excavation-induced ground movements: using transfer functions to review the limiting tensile strain method

Korhan Deniz Dalgic, Max A.N. Hendriks, Alper Ilki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
558 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, limiting tensile strain method (LTSM) is reviewed, and advantages and disadvantages resulted from the simplicity of this method are examined in the light of the findings of the existing experimental and numerical studies. Using the viewpoint of the transfer functions for the LTSM, a more independent sight for the interpretation of the relationships between deflection ratio, structure’s geometry, longitudinal/shear stiffness ratio and the limiting tensile strain is provided. In addition, the effect of average horizontal strain is included simply in the modified deep beam equations. Using reported data and observed damage classes of real and simulated case studies available in the literature, back-calculations for the coefficients of the transfer function are made. After comparing the back-calculated coefficients to the original coefficients of the LTSM, it is shown that observed damage and measured crack widths are reasonably compatible with the proposed limiting tensile strain boundaries. Also, it is shown that for the cases in which moderate or higher damage was observed, the original deep beam equations tend to underestimate the resultant damage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-779
Number of pages14
JournalStructure and Infrastructure Engineering
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • brick masonry
  • damage assessment
  • excavation
  • Settlement
  • tunnels & tunnelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building response to tunnelling- and excavation-induced ground movements: using transfer functions to review the limiting tensile strain method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this