Clarifying the Interpretation and Use of the LOLE Resource Adequacy Metric

Gord Stephen, Simon H. Tindemans, John Fazio, Chris J. Dent, Armando Figueroa Acevedo, Bagen Bagen, Alex Crawford, Andreas Klaube, Douglas Logan, Daniel Burke

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The loss-of-load expectation (LOLE) risk metric has been used in probabilistic power system resource adequacy assessment for over 70 years, and today is one of the most recognizable and widely-used measures of system shortfall risk. However, this wide adoption has been accompanied by ambiguities and inconsistencies in its definition and application. This paper provides a unifying reference for defining the metric as it relates to modern analyses, while clarifying a number of common points of confusion in its application. In particular, the paper clarifies that LOLE is not a measure of expected total shortfall duration, that a 2.4 hours per year LOLE target implies a less reliable system than a 1 day in 10 years (0.1 days per year) LOLE target, and that exact conversions between hourly and daily LOLE targets are not generally possible. Illustrative examples are provided to help explain each of these points
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
EventPMAPS 2022: The 17th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems - Online at Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Jun 202215 Jun 2022
Conference number: 17th

Conference

ConferencePMAPS 2022
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityOnline at Manchester
Period12/06/2215/06/22

Keywords

  • probabilistic assessment
  • power system planning
  • LOLE
  • risk metrics
  • resource adequacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clarifying the Interpretation and Use of the LOLE Resource Adequacy Metric'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this