Closing the open public data feedback loop: the ENGAGE platform

C Alexopoulos, Anneke Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, Y Charalabidis, E Loukis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

One essential element of open data ecosystems concerns their development through feedback loops, discussions and dynamic supplier and user interactions. However, these elements appear barely to be part of existing open data practices. We conducted a survey which showed that most professional open data users did not know at least one open data infrastructure that enabled five specific types of discussion and feedback mechanisms. The survey showed that much can still be done to improve feedback and discussion on open data infrastructures. In this paper we discuss an open data infrastructure which has started to contribute to filling this gap. The discussed ENGAGE open data infrastructure combines functionalities to close the feedback loop and to return information to public authorities for better open data use and publication as well as establishing communication channels between stakeholders. This may effectively lead to the stimulation and facilitation of value generation from open data.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of Samos Workshop: Uses of Open Data Within Government for Innovation and Efficiency
Pages1-5
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventSamos Workshop: Uses of Open Data Within Government for Innovation and Efficiency. Forward-Looking, Visionary Approaches for Public Sector Information Sharing and Utilisation - Samos, Greece
Duration: 30 Jun 20145 Jul 2014

Workshop

WorkshopSamos Workshop: Uses of Open Data Within Government for Innovation and Efficiency. Forward-Looking, Visionary Approaches for Public Sector Information Sharing and Utilisation
Period30/06/145/07/14

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closing the open public data feedback loop: the ENGAGE platform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this