TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-present and remote audience experiences
T2 - Intensity and cohesion
AU - Geelhoed, Erik
AU - Singh-Barmi, Kuldip
AU - Biscoe, Ian
AU - Cesar, Pablo
AU - Jansen, Jack
AU - Wang, Chen
AU - Kaiser, Rene
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This article presents the results of modelling audience response to new types of networked theatre plays. As the main contribution of the work we introduce two types of metrics: intensity, relating to how intensively co-present and remote aspects of a performance are rated, and cohesion, relating to how a performance as a whole, the combination of co-present and remote aspects, affects an audience. In particular, we model audience response based on two in the wild evaluations, staged by a low budget theatre company, a streamed and a distributed performance. The streamed performance is similar to NT Live, where a theatre play is delivered to other theatres with an audience. The distributed performance, on the other hand, connects actors in two different theatres (with audiences) creating one single play. The streamed performance was experienced as less intense as well as less cohesive by the remote audience, whilst the distributed performance integrated co-present and remote aspects tightly. Remote aspects of the distributed performance were still experienced as less intense, but the performance as a whole was highly cohesive. Apart from the identification of these two new metrics (intensity and cohesion), based on our experiences we argue that an innovative way of bundling relevant emerging technologies is needed to give a voice to the, as yet silent, remote audience.
AB - This article presents the results of modelling audience response to new types of networked theatre plays. As the main contribution of the work we introduce two types of metrics: intensity, relating to how intensively co-present and remote aspects of a performance are rated, and cohesion, relating to how a performance as a whole, the combination of co-present and remote aspects, affects an audience. In particular, we model audience response based on two in the wild evaluations, staged by a low budget theatre company, a streamed and a distributed performance. The streamed performance is similar to NT Live, where a theatre play is delivered to other theatres with an audience. The distributed performance, on the other hand, connects actors in two different theatres (with audiences) creating one single play. The streamed performance was experienced as less intense as well as less cohesive by the remote audience, whilst the distributed performance integrated co-present and remote aspects tightly. Remote aspects of the distributed performance were still experienced as less intense, but the performance as a whole was highly cohesive. Apart from the identification of these two new metrics (intensity and cohesion), based on our experiences we argue that an innovative way of bundling relevant emerging technologies is needed to give a voice to the, as yet silent, remote audience.
KW - Audience evaluation
KW - Audience feedback
KW - Distributed performances
KW - Evaluation methods
KW - Media experiences
KW - Streaming performances
KW - Telepresence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988349475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11042-016-3879-z
DO - 10.1007/s11042-016-3879-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988349475
SN - 1380-7501
SP - 5573
EP - 5606
JO - Multimedia Tools and Applications
JF - Multimedia Tools and Applications
ER -