Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.

Lieke A. Melsen*, Paul J.J.F. Torfs, Remko Uijlenhoet, Adriaan J. Teuling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientificpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2568-2569
Number of pages2
JournalWater Resources Research
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • computational hydrology
  • repeatability
  • reproducibility

Cite this