Comparative analysis of nonparametric change-point detectors commonly used in hydrology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
197 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several commonly-used nonparametric change-point detection methods are analysed in terms of power, ability and accuracy of the estimated change-point location. The analysis is performed with synthetic data for different sample sizes, two types of change and different magnitudes of change. The methods studied are the Pettitt method, a method based on the Cramér von Mises (CvM) two-sample test statistic and a variant of the CUSUM method. The methods differ considerably in behaviour. For all methods the spread of estimated change-point location increases significantly for points near one of the ends of the sample. Series of annual maximum runoff for four stations on the Yangtze River in China are used to examine the performance of the methods on real data. It was found that the CvM-based test gave the best results, but all three methods suffer from bias and low detection rates for change points near the ends of the series.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1690–1710
Number of pages21
JournalHydrological Sciences Journal
Volume64
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • ability
  • change-point detection
  • Cramér von Mises test
  • CUSUM test
  • Pettitt test
  • power
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of nonparametric change-point detectors commonly used in hydrology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this