Comparing 2D and 3D linear response of a simplified LNG membrane cargo containment system

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The difference between 2D and 3D response is quantified using wide loads with different slopes and concentrated loads with different impact locations. For wide loads the slope is not important for the maximum indentation, but does effect the maximum stress. Similarly, when a concentrated load is small compared to the panel, the impact location is not important. There is however a large difference in response between the wide and concentrated loads. To conclude: the 2D response is only valid for wide loads with small slopes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 28th (2018) International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE-2018)
EditorsHiromitsu Kitagawa, Demos Angelides, Jin S. Chung
Place of PublicationCupertino, CA, USA
PublisherInternational Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE)
Pages780-787
ISBN (Print)978-1-880653-87-6
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventISOPE 2018: 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference - Sapporo, Japan
Duration: 10 Jun 201815 Jun 2018

Conference

ConferenceISOPE 2018: 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference
CountryJapan
CitySapporo
Period10/06/1815/06/18

Keywords

  • simplified
  • response
  • 2D and 3D loads
  • cargo containment system
  • LNG

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing 2D and 3D linear response of a simplified LNG membrane cargo containment system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this