Comparison of helix and wake steering control for varying turbine spacing and wind direction

A variety of wind farm control strategies exist in order to reduce unfavorable wake effects in large wind farms. While strategies like wake steering already reached a high maturity level, it is interesting to compare them to more recently proposed strategies. Such a comparison can form the basis for the development of a symbiotic wind farm control toolbox, from which a control strategy is chosen and activated depending on the operating conditions. The present study compares wake steering with helix control across a wide range of turbine spacings and wind directions using large-eddy simulation (LES). The size of the search space is made computationally tractable for LES by adopting a setup based on one physical upstream turbine and a distribution of virtual downstream turbines which do not exert any thrust force. It is found that helix control is beneficial for full wake overlap and turbine spacing of less than six rotor diameters whereas wake steering proves to be optimal further downstream and for partial wake overlap. Furthermore, the results show that the helix control setpoint in the proximity of full wake overlap scenarios is less susceptible to wind direction variations. This finding indicates that the combination of wake steering and helix control has potential for the design of a wind farm controller which is more robust in full wake overlap scenarios and can reduce the need for large yaw offset adjustments.