TY - CHAP
T1 - Conceptual Disruption and the Ethics of Technology
AU - Hopster, J.
AU - Brey, P.
AU - Klenk, M.B.O.T.
AU - Löhr, G.
AU - Marchiori, S.
AU - Lundgren, B.
AU - Scharp, K.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This chapter provides a theoretical lens on conceptual disruption. It offers a typology of conceptual disruption, discusses its relation to conceptual engineering, and sketches a programmatic view of the implications of conceptual disruption for the ethics of technology. We begin by distinguishing between three different kinds of conceptual disruptions: conceptual gaps, conceptual overlaps, and conceptual misalignments. Subsequently, we distinguish between different mechanisms of conceptual disruption, and two modes of conceptual change. We point out that disruptions may be induced by technology, but can also be triggered by intercultural exchanges. Conceptual disruptions frequently yield conceptual uncertainty and may call for conceptual and ethical inquiry. We argue that a useful approach to address conceptual disruptions is to engage in conceptual engineering. We outline what conceptual engineering involves and argue that discussions on conceptual disruption and conceptual engineering can benefit from closer integration. In closing, we discuss the relevance of studying conceptual disruption for technology ethics, and point to the promise of this line of research to innovate practical philosophy at large.
AB - This chapter provides a theoretical lens on conceptual disruption. It offers a typology of conceptual disruption, discusses its relation to conceptual engineering, and sketches a programmatic view of the implications of conceptual disruption for the ethics of technology. We begin by distinguishing between three different kinds of conceptual disruptions: conceptual gaps, conceptual overlaps, and conceptual misalignments. Subsequently, we distinguish between different mechanisms of conceptual disruption, and two modes of conceptual change. We point out that disruptions may be induced by technology, but can also be triggered by intercultural exchanges. Conceptual disruptions frequently yield conceptual uncertainty and may call for conceptual and ethical inquiry. We argue that a useful approach to address conceptual disruptions is to engage in conceptual engineering. We outline what conceptual engineering involves and argue that discussions on conceptual disruption and conceptual engineering can benefit from closer integration. In closing, we discuss the relevance of studying conceptual disruption for technology ethics, and point to the promise of this line of research to innovate practical philosophy at large.
KW - Conceptual disruption
KW - Conceptual engineering
KW - Socially disruptive technologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182526803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11647/OBP.0366.06
DO - 10.11647/OBP.0366.06
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781805110170
SP - 141
EP - 162
BT - Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies
A2 - van de Poel, lbo
A2 - Frank, Lily
A2 - Hermann, Julia
A2 - Hopster, Jeroen
A2 - Lenzi, Dominic
A2 - Nyholm, Sven
A2 - Taebi, Behnam
A2 - Ziliotti, Elena
PB - Open Book Publishers
ER -