TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptual process design of an integrated bio-based acetic acid, glycolaldehyde, and acetol production in a pyrolysis oil-based biorefinery
AU - Vitasari, CR
AU - Meindersma, G.W.
AU - de Haan, AB
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This paper discusses the conceptual process design for the integrated production of bio-based acetic acid, glycolaldehyde, and acetol from forest residue- and pine-derived pyrolysisoils. Aspen Plus®and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer were used for process simulationand estimating the equipment cost, respectively. The process was designed at a capacity200 kt pyrolysis oil per year, operating 8000 h annually, and involving extraction, distillation,and evaporation. It can isolate more than 99% of the glycolaldehyde and acetic acid andabout two-thirds of the acetol present in the oils. In comparison with the forest residue-based process (21 MD ), the pine-based process requires a higher capital investment of 23MD and a slightly higher production cost of 49 MD /a versus 48 MD /a, but can provide ahigher revenue of 57 MD /a instead of 44 MD /a because pine-derived pyrolysis oil containsmore acetic acid, glycolaldehyde, and acetol, which also makes it less sensitive to marketprice. Pine-derived pyrolysis oil is a preferable feedstock over forest residue-derived pyrolysisoil for an integrated chemical recovery process, whereas forest residue-derived pyrolysis oilgenerates no profit at an annual capacity of 50¿600 kt oil. The economic feasibility of thedesigned process is highly dependent on the glycolaldehyde content of the pyrolysis oil.
AB - This paper discusses the conceptual process design for the integrated production of bio-based acetic acid, glycolaldehyde, and acetol from forest residue- and pine-derived pyrolysisoils. Aspen Plus®and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer were used for process simulationand estimating the equipment cost, respectively. The process was designed at a capacity200 kt pyrolysis oil per year, operating 8000 h annually, and involving extraction, distillation,and evaporation. It can isolate more than 99% of the glycolaldehyde and acetic acid andabout two-thirds of the acetol present in the oils. In comparison with the forest residue-based process (21 MD ), the pine-based process requires a higher capital investment of 23MD and a slightly higher production cost of 49 MD /a versus 48 MD /a, but can provide ahigher revenue of 57 MD /a instead of 44 MD /a because pine-derived pyrolysis oil containsmore acetic acid, glycolaldehyde, and acetol, which also makes it less sensitive to marketprice. Pine-derived pyrolysis oil is a preferable feedstock over forest residue-derived pyrolysisoil for an integrated chemical recovery process, whereas forest residue-derived pyrolysis oilgenerates no profit at an annual capacity of 50¿600 kt oil. The economic feasibility of thedesigned process is highly dependent on the glycolaldehyde content of the pyrolysis oil.
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-8762
VL - 95
SP - 133
EP - 143
JO - Chemical Engineering Research and Design
JF - Chemical Engineering Research and Design
ER -