Corrections to &#x201C;Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)

Verya Daeichin; Tom Van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Bulent Ergin; Patricia A.C. Specht; Alexandre Lima; Can Ince; Johan G. Bosch; Antonius F.W. Van der Steen; Nico De Jong; Klazina Kooiman

doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)

Verya Daeichin, Tom Van Rooij, Ilya Skachkov, Bulent Ergin, Patricia A.C. Specht, Alexandre Lima, Can Ince, Johan G. Bosch, Antonius F.W. Van der Steen, Nico De Jong, Klazina Kooiman

ImPhys/Medical Imaging

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the above article [1], the authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments, the unit in mg/mL was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% in order to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol [2], [3], not 328.53 g/mol. On page 556, Table I should read as shown here.

Original language	English
Article number	9381894
Pages (from-to)	2321
Number of pages	1
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
Volume	68
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

Erratum voor 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342

Keywords

Acoustics
Coatings
Frequency control
In vitro
In vivo
Production
Ultrasonic imaging

Access to Document

10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Daeichin, V., Van Rooij, T., Skachkov, I., Ergin, B., Specht, P. A. C., Lima, A., Ince, C., Bosch, J. G., Van der Steen, A. F. W., De Jong, N., & Kooiman, K. (2021). Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342). IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 68(6), 2321. Article 9381894. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

Daeichin, Verya ; Van Rooij, Tom ; Skachkov, Ilya et al. / Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging : Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342). In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2021 ; Vol. 68, No. 6. pp. 2321.

@article{9d9b2da526584c3caf6d26b18039887b,

title = "Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)",

abstract = "In the above article [1], the authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments, the unit in mg/mL was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% in order to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol [2], [3], not 328.53 g/mol. On page 556, Table I should read as shown here.",

keywords = "Acoustics, Coatings, Frequency control, In vitro, In vivo, Production, Ultrasonic imaging",

author = "Verya Daeichin and {Van Rooij}, Tom and Ilya Skachkov and Bulent Ergin and Specht, {Patricia A.C.} and Alexandre Lima and Can Ince and Bosch, {Johan G.} and {Van der Steen}, {Antonius F.W.} and {De Jong}, Nico and Klazina Kooiman",

note = "Erratum voor 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599",

language = "English",

volume = "68",

pages = "2321",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control",

issn = "0885-3010",

publisher = "IEEE",

number = "6",

}

Daeichin, V, Van Rooij, T, Skachkov, I, Ergin, B, Specht, PAC, Lima, A, Ince, C, Bosch, JG, Van der Steen, AFW , De Jong, N & Kooiman, K 2021, 'Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 68, no. 6, 9381894, pp. 2321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342). / Daeichin, Verya; Van Rooij, Tom; Skachkov, Ilya et al.
In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Vol. 68, No. 6, 9381894, 2021, p. 2321.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

T2 - Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)

AU - Daeichin, Verya

AU - Van Rooij, Tom

AU - Skachkov, Ilya

AU - Ergin, Bulent

AU - Specht, Patricia A.C.

AU - Lima, Alexandre

AU - Ince, Can

AU - Bosch, Johan G.

AU - Van der Steen, Antonius F.W.

AU - De Jong, Nico

AU - Kooiman, Klazina

N1 - Erratum voor 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In the above article [1], the authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments, the unit in mg/mL was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% in order to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol [2], [3], not 328.53 g/mol. On page 556, Table I should read as shown here.

AB - In the above article [1], the authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments, the unit in mg/mL was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% in order to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol [2], [3], not 328.53 g/mol. On page 556, Table I should read as shown here.

KW - Acoustics

KW - Coatings

KW - Frequency control

KW - In vitro

KW - In vivo

KW - Production

KW - Ultrasonic imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103266888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

DO - 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85103266888

SN - 0885-3010

VL - 68

SP - 2321

JO - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

JF - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

IS - 6

M1 - 9381894

ER -

Daeichin V, Van Rooij T, Skachkov I, Ergin B, Specht PAC, Lima A et al. Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342). IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2021;68(6):2321. 9381894. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3067599