Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)

Verya Daeichin, Tom Van Rooij, Ilya Skachkov, Bulent Ergin, Patricia A.C. Specht, Alexandre Lima, Can Ince, Johan G. Bosch, Antonius F.W. Van der Steen, Nico De Jong, Klazina Kooiman

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the above article [1], the authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments, the unit in mg/mL was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% in order to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol [2], [3], not 328.53 g/mol. On page 556, Table I should read as shown here.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9381894
Pages (from-to)2321
Number of pages1
JournalIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Erratum voor 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342

Keywords

  • Acoustics
  • Coatings
  • Frequency control
  • In vitro
  • In vivo
  • Production
  • Ultrasonic imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrections to “Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation (IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this