Correlations between the shifts in prompt gamma emission profiles and the changes in daily target coverage during simulated pencil beam scanning proton therapy

Eelco Lens, Thyrza Jagt, Mischa Hoogeman, Dennis Schaart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using prompt gamma (PG) ray emission profiles to monitor changes in dose to the planning target volume (PTV) during pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy as a result of day-to-day variation in patient anatomy.
 For 11 prostate patients, we simulated treatment plan delivery using the patients' daily anatomy as observed in the planning CT and 7-9 control CT scans, including the detected PG profiles resulting from the 5%, 10%, and 20% most intense proton pencil beams. For each patient, we determined the changes in dosimetric parameters for the high- and low-dose PTVs between the simulations performed using the planning CT scan and the different control CT scans and correlated these to changes in the PG emission profiles.
 Changes in coverage of the high- and low-dose PTV correlated most strongly with the median and mean absolute PG emission profile shifts of the 5% most intense pencil beams, respectively. With a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.76 (SD: 0.17) for the high-dose PTV and of -0.60 (SD: 0.51) for the low-dose PTV.
 We showed, as a proof of principle, that PG emission profiles obtained during PBS proton therapy could be used to detect changes in PTV coverage due to day-to-day anatomical variation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number085009
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation: Oncology - Biology - Physics
Volume64
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correlations between the shifts in prompt gamma emission profiles and the changes in daily target coverage during simulated pencil beam scanning proton therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this