Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))

Russell McKenna; Stefan Pfenninger; Heidi Heinrichs; Johannes Schmidt; Iain Staffell; Christian Bauer; Katharina Gruber; Andrea N. Hahmann; Malte Jansen; Michael Klingler; Natascha Landwehr; Xiaoli Guo Larsén; Johan Lilliestam; Bryn Pickering; Martin Robinius; Tim Tröndle; Olga Turkovska; Sebastian Wehrle; Jann Michael Weinand; Jan Wohland

doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))

Russell McKenna^*, Stefan Pfenninger, Heidi Heinrichs, Johannes Schmidt, Iain Staffell, Christian Bauer, Katharina Gruber, Andrea N. Hahmann, Malte Jansen, Michael Klingler, Natascha Landwehr, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Johan Lilliestam, Bryn Pickering, Martin Robinius, Tim Tröndle, Olga Turkovska, Sebastian Wehrle, Jann Michael Weinand, Jan Wohland

^*Corresponding author for this work

Energy and Industry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

The authors wish to point out a typesetting error in Equation (1) of the above paper, published as [1] in this journal. An addition sign “+” was mistakenly replaced with a multiplication sign “∙” in this equation, as shown in Equation (1a) below. [Formula presented] There correct version of this equation is given in Equation (1b): [Formula presented]where n is the lifetime of the technology, I0 the investment [$], Mt the annual costs in year t [$/year], Et energy produced in year t [MWh/year] and i the interest rate. The authors apologise for any inconveince caused. This minor error has no implications for the validity of the conclusions and recommendations presented in section 6 of the original paper.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1128
Number of pages	1
Journal	Renewable Energy
Volume	190
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136
Publication status	Published - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

McKenna, R., Pfenninger, S., Heinrichs, H., Schmidt, J., Staffell, I., Bauer, C., Gruber, K., Hahmann, A. N., Jansen, M., Klingler, M., Landwehr, N., Larsén, X. G., Lilliestam, J., Pickering, B., Robinius, M., Tröndle, T., Turkovska, O., Wehrle, S., Weinand, J. M., & Wohland, J. (2022). Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027)). Renewable Energy, 190, 1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

@article{67cef2b862fd4f66b386265bc28bbc82,

title = "Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))",

abstract = "The authors wish to point out a typesetting error in Equation (1) of the above paper, published as [1] in this journal. An addition sign “+” was mistakenly replaced with a multiplication sign “∙” in this equation, as shown in Equation (1a) below. [Formula presented] There correct version of this equation is given in Equation (1b): [Formula presented]where n is the lifetime of the technology, I0 the investment [$], Mt the annual costs in year t [$/year], Et energy produced in year t [MWh/year] and i the interest rate. The authors apologise for any inconveince caused. This minor error has no implications for the validity of the conclusions and recommendations presented in section 6 of the original paper.",

author = "Russell McKenna and Stefan Pfenninger and Heidi Heinrichs and Johannes Schmidt and Iain Staffell and Christian Bauer and Katharina Gruber and Hahmann, {Andrea N.} and Malte Jansen and Michael Klingler and Natascha Landwehr and Lars{\'e}n, {Xiaoli Guo} and Johan Lilliestam and Bryn Pickering and Martin Robinius and Tim Tr{\"o}ndle and Olga Turkovska and Sebastian Wehrle and Weinand, {Jann Michael} and Jan Wohland",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136",

language = "English",

volume = "190",

pages = "1128",

journal = "Renewable Energy",

issn = "0960-1481",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

McKenna, R, Pfenninger, S, Heinrichs, H, Schmidt, J, Staffell, I, Bauer, C, Gruber, K, Hahmann, AN, Jansen, M, Klingler, M, Landwehr, N, Larsén, XG, Lilliestam, J, Pickering, B, Robinius, M, Tröndle, T, Turkovska, O, Wehrle, S, Weinand, JM & Wohland, J 2022, 'Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))', Renewable Energy, vol. 190, pp. 1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027)). / McKenna, Russell; Pfenninger, Stefan; Heinrichs, Heidi et al.
In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 190, 2022, p. 1128.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments

T2 - A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))

AU - McKenna, Russell

AU - Pfenninger, Stefan

AU - Heinrichs, Heidi

AU - Schmidt, Johannes

AU - Staffell, Iain

AU - Bauer, Christian

AU - Gruber, Katharina

AU - Hahmann, Andrea N.

AU - Jansen, Malte

AU - Klingler, Michael

AU - Landwehr, Natascha

AU - Larsén, Xiaoli Guo

AU - Lilliestam, Johan

AU - Pickering, Bryn

AU - Robinius, Martin

AU - Tröndle, Tim

AU - Turkovska, Olga

AU - Wehrle, Sebastian

AU - Weinand, Jann Michael

AU - Wohland, Jan

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The authors wish to point out a typesetting error in Equation (1) of the above paper, published as [1] in this journal. An addition sign “+” was mistakenly replaced with a multiplication sign “∙” in this equation, as shown in Equation (1a) below. [Formula presented] There correct version of this equation is given in Equation (1b): [Formula presented]where n is the lifetime of the technology, I0 the investment [$], Mt the annual costs in year t [$/year], Et energy produced in year t [MWh/year] and i the interest rate. The authors apologise for any inconveince caused. This minor error has no implications for the validity of the conclusions and recommendations presented in section 6 of the original paper.

AB - The authors wish to point out a typesetting error in Equation (1) of the above paper, published as [1] in this journal. An addition sign “+” was mistakenly replaced with a multiplication sign “∙” in this equation, as shown in Equation (1a) below. [Formula presented] There correct version of this equation is given in Equation (1b): [Formula presented]where n is the lifetime of the technology, I0 the investment [$], Mt the annual costs in year t [$/year], Et energy produced in year t [MWh/year] and i the interest rate. The authors apologise for any inconveince caused. This minor error has no implications for the validity of the conclusions and recommendations presented in section 6 of the original paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128338809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85128338809

SN - 0960-1481

VL - 190

SP - 1128

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

ER -

McKenna R, Pfenninger S, Heinrichs H, Schmidt J, Staffell I, Bauer C et al. Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027)). Renewable Energy. 2022;190:1128. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.136

Corrigendum to High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs (Renewable Energy (2022) 182 (659–684), (S0960148121014841), (10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027))

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this