Research output per year
Research output per year
Sebastián CaroOrtiz, Remco Hens, Erik Zuidema, Marcello Rigutto, David Dubbeldam, Thijs J.H. Vlugt
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific › peerreview
Vaporliquid equilibria of xylenes were computed using Monte Carlo simulations in the Gibbs ensemble. For binary mixtures, the predicted composition of the liquid phase is in agreement with experiments. The computed vapor phase densities of each isomer showed an effect on the predicted composition of the vapor phase of the mixture. Unfortunately, the Monte Carlo code used to calculate the vaporliquid equilibrium contained an error in the acceptance rule for molecule transfer in multicomponent mixtures. The Continuous Fractional Component (CFCMC) [1–3] algorithm in the Gibbs ensemble adds an extra molecule the fractional moleculeper molecule type. In the CFCMC algorithm, trial moves are attempted to transform a fractional molecule of type a in box i to a whole molecule and, simultaneously, transform a molecule of type a in box j [Formula presented] i to a fractional molecule. These trial moves should be accepted according to Ref. [1]: [Formula presented] where [Formula presented] is the number of molecules of type a in box j, [Formula presented] is the number of molecules of type a in box i, and [Formula presented] is the energy difference between the old and the new configuration. Unfortunately, what was implemented (incorrectly) in the computer code is: [Formula presented] where [Formula presented] and [Formula presented] are the total number of molecules of all types in box i and j, respectively, and not only of type a. For the simulation of a single component, [Formula presented] and [Formula presented]. Therefore, the mistake in the acceptance rule only affects the simulations that include more than one component. As such, Figs. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, and Table 1 of the article are not affected by this error. This error was hard to detect for xylene isomers, as the boiling point of these isomers are close, and therefore [Formula presented] is close to [Formula presented]. The corrected code has been tested to yield the same results as the RASPA software [4,5] for various multicomponent systems. The phase composition diagram using the correct code is shown in Fig. 5. The observations based on the incorrect results remain. The composition of the liquid phase is not affected by the choice of force field or method for electrostatic interactions. For all the force fields, the correct vapor phase composition calculated with the Ewald and the Wolf methods are closer than in the incorrect simulations. In the incorrect results, the largest difference between vapor phase composition calculated with the Wolf and the Ewald method was 0.089 [mol/mol]. In the correct results, this difference is reduced to 0.067 [mol/mol]. [Figure presented] The predicted composition of the liquid phase is in excellent agreement with the experimental data. The correct simulations of the vapor phase compositions are closer to the experimental data than the incorrect simulations. The simulations with the incorrect acceptance rules showed an azeotrope behaviour that is not present in the correct simulations of the phase compositions. [Figure presented] The phase composition of the binary mixture and the excess chemical potential are not related. This is consistent with the observations from the incorrect simulations. [Formula presented] The predicted composition of the liquid phase is in excellent agreement with the experimental data. The correct simulations of the vapor phase compositions are closer to the experimental data than the incorrect simulations. The simulations with the incorrect acceptance rules showed an azeotrope behaviour that is not present in the correct simulations. [Figure presented]
Original language  English 

Article number  112370 
Number of pages  3 
Journal  Fluid Phase Equilibria 
Volume  506 
DOIs 

Publication status  Published  2020 
Research output: Thesis › Dissertation (TU Delft)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peerreview