Crowd-based innovaties: verschuivende verantwoordelijkheden in een institutional void

Translated title of the contribution: Crowd-based innovations: shifting responsibilities in an institutional void

Thijs Slot, Eefje Cuppen, Neelke Doorn, Maria Galeano Galvan, Bram Klievink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Downloads (Pure)


The crowd increasingly plays a key role in facilitating innovations in a variety of sectors, spurred on by IT developments and the concomitant increase in connectivity. Initiatives in this direction, captured under the umbrella term ‘crowd-based innovations’, offer novel opportunities in socio-technical systems by increasing the access, reach and speed of services. At the same time, they signify important challenges because these innovations occur in a context of traditional, well-established institutional and governance structures and practices. This dynamic is captured in the idea of the ‘institutional void’: the tension between traditional structures and (radically) new initiatives. Existing rules, standards and practices are challenged, which raises questions about the safeguarding of public values such as quality, legitimacy, efficiency and governance of crowd-based innovations. This article argues that understanding these tensions requires supplementing empirical research with an explicitly normative dimension to reach thorough and balanced conclusions to facilitate innovation while protecting the valuable elements in existing rules and regulations. Illustrated by a number of short examples, we propose a multidisciplinary research agenda towards formulating appropriate governance structures.
Translated title of the contributionCrowd-based innovations: shifting responsibilities in an institutional void
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)31-42
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017


  • responsible innovation
  • institutional void
  • crowd-based innovations
  • governance


Dive into the research topics of 'Crowd-based innovations: shifting responsibilities in an institutional void'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this