TY - JOUR
T1 - Curved concrete crownwalls on vertical breakwaters under impulsive wave load
T2 - Finite Element Analysis
AU - Gísladóttir, Lára M.
AU - Castellino, Myrta
AU - Dermentzoglou, Dimitrios
AU - Hendriks, Max A.N.
AU - de Girolamo, Paolo
AU - van Gent, Marcel R.A.
AU - Antonini, Alessandro
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Curved concrete crownwalls are commonly installed on vertical breakwaters in deep water to mitigate wave overtopping. This study compares the hydraulic and structural performance of fully curved and recurved crownwalls under impulsive wave loads induced by non-breaking waves, known as Confined-Crest Impact. Using one-way coupled numerical simulations in OpenFOAM and structural analyses in DIANA FEA, we assess the pressure fields and structural responses of the two geometries. Results reveal that while the fully curved crownwall significantly reduces overtopping, it experiences wave forces up to 2.5 times greater than the recurved crownwall, along with longer pressure impulse durations, leading to amplified tensile stresses and higher risk of cracking. In contrast, the recurved crownwall, despite localized peak pressures, benefits from a broader cross-section and linear stress distribution, resulting in better structural performance. These findings underscore the importance of integrating dynamic structural analysis in crownwall design to balance hydraulic efficiency with structural resilience.
AB - Curved concrete crownwalls are commonly installed on vertical breakwaters in deep water to mitigate wave overtopping. This study compares the hydraulic and structural performance of fully curved and recurved crownwalls under impulsive wave loads induced by non-breaking waves, known as Confined-Crest Impact. Using one-way coupled numerical simulations in OpenFOAM and structural analyses in DIANA FEA, we assess the pressure fields and structural responses of the two geometries. Results reveal that while the fully curved crownwall significantly reduces overtopping, it experiences wave forces up to 2.5 times greater than the recurved crownwall, along with longer pressure impulse durations, leading to amplified tensile stresses and higher risk of cracking. In contrast, the recurved crownwall, despite localized peak pressures, benefits from a broader cross-section and linear stress distribution, resulting in better structural performance. These findings underscore the importance of integrating dynamic structural analysis in crownwall design to balance hydraulic efficiency with structural resilience.
KW - Concrete crownwall
KW - Confined-Crest Impact
KW - FEA structural analysis
KW - Structural dynamic response
KW - Wave–structure interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007694971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104791
DO - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104791
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007694971
SN - 0378-3839
VL - 201
JO - Coastal Engineering
JF - Coastal Engineering
M1 - 104791
ER -