TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep-reinforcement-learning-based separation control in a two-dimensional airfoil
AU - Garcia, Xavier
AU - Miró, Arnau
AU - Suárez, Pol
AU - Alcántara-Ávila, Francisco
AU - Rabault, Jean
AU - Font, Bernat
AU - Lehmkuhl, Oriol
AU - Vinuesa, Ricardo
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The aim of this study is to discover new active-flow-control (AFC) techniques for separation mitigation in a two-dimensional NACA 0012 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 3000. To find these AFC strategies, a framework consisting of a deep-reinforcement-learning (DRL) agent has been used to determine the action strategies to apply to the flow. The actions involve blowing and suction through jets at the airfoil surface. The flow is simulated with the numerical code Alya, which is a low-dissipation finite-element code, on a high-performance computing system. Various control strategies obtained through DRL led to 43.9% drag reduction, while others yielded an increase in aerodynamic efficiency of 58.6%. In comparison, periodic-control strategies demonstrated lower energy efficiency while failing to achieve the same level of aerodynamic improvements as the DRL-based approach. These gains have been attained through the implementation of a dynamic, closed-loop, time-dependent, active control mechanism over the airfoil.
AB - The aim of this study is to discover new active-flow-control (AFC) techniques for separation mitigation in a two-dimensional NACA 0012 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 3000. To find these AFC strategies, a framework consisting of a deep-reinforcement-learning (DRL) agent has been used to determine the action strategies to apply to the flow. The actions involve blowing and suction through jets at the airfoil surface. The flow is simulated with the numerical code Alya, which is a low-dissipation finite-element code, on a high-performance computing system. Various control strategies obtained through DRL led to 43.9% drag reduction, while others yielded an increase in aerodynamic efficiency of 58.6%. In comparison, periodic-control strategies demonstrated lower energy efficiency while failing to achieve the same level of aerodynamic improvements as the DRL-based approach. These gains have been attained through the implementation of a dynamic, closed-loop, time-dependent, active control mechanism over the airfoil.
KW - Active flow control
KW - Airfoil
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Deep reinforcement learning
KW - Drag Reduction
KW - Energy Efficiency
KW - Flow Separation Control
KW - Fluid Mechanics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008657085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109913
DO - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109913
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008657085
SN - 0142-727X
VL - 116
JO - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
JF - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
M1 - 109913
ER -