TY - JOUR
T1 - Designing for justice in electricity systems
T2 - A comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands
AU - Milchram, Christine
AU - Künneke, Rolf
AU - Doorn, Neelke
AU - van de Kaa, Geerten
AU - Hillerbrand, Rafaela
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In future urban energy systems, smart grid systems will be crucial for the integration of renewable energy. However, their deployment has moral implications, for example regarding data privacy, user autonomy, or distribution of responsibilities. ‘Energy justice’ is one of the most comprehensive frameworks to address these implications, but remains limited regarding smart grids, and regarding concrete guidelines for designers and policymakers. In this paper, we fill this gap by answering the following research question: How do design choices in smart grid projects impact energy justice? Thereby, four smart grid pilot projects are evaluated in a comparative qualitative case study research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and a content analysis. Our findings contribute to the energy justice literature with insights regarding the design for distributive, recognition, and procedural justice. They underscore the importance of fairness in data governance, participatory design, user control and autonomy, technology inclusiveness, and the design for expansion and replication. Future research should explore the feasibility to govern smart grids as commons and the relationship between trust and perceptions of justice. We conclude with policy recommendations for funding future smart grid experiments and for facilitating the implementation of storage through electricity sector regulation.
AB - In future urban energy systems, smart grid systems will be crucial for the integration of renewable energy. However, their deployment has moral implications, for example regarding data privacy, user autonomy, or distribution of responsibilities. ‘Energy justice’ is one of the most comprehensive frameworks to address these implications, but remains limited regarding smart grids, and regarding concrete guidelines for designers and policymakers. In this paper, we fill this gap by answering the following research question: How do design choices in smart grid projects impact energy justice? Thereby, four smart grid pilot projects are evaluated in a comparative qualitative case study research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and a content analysis. Our findings contribute to the energy justice literature with insights regarding the design for distributive, recognition, and procedural justice. They underscore the importance of fairness in data governance, participatory design, user control and autonomy, technology inclusiveness, and the design for expansion and replication. Future research should explore the feasibility to govern smart grids as commons and the relationship between trust and perceptions of justice. We conclude with policy recommendations for funding future smart grid experiments and for facilitating the implementation of storage through electricity sector regulation.
KW - Case study research
KW - Design for justice
KW - Digitalization
KW - Energy justice
KW - Flexibility
KW - Smart grid systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092889693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111720
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111720
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092889693
VL - 147
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
SN - 0301-4215
M1 - 111720
ER -