Detecting high-risk accident locations

Simon Washington, Amir Pooyan Afghari, Mohammed Mazharul Haque

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this chapter is to review the methodological and empirical underpinnings of transport network screening, or management, as it relates to improving road safety. As jurisdictions around the world are charged with transport network management in order to reduce externalities associated with road crashes, identifying potential blackspots or hotspots is an important if not critical function and responsibility of transport agencies. Methodology – Key references from within the literature are summarised and discussed, along with a discussion of the evolution of thinking around hotspot identification and management. The theoretical developments that correspond with the evolution in thinking are provided, sprinkled with examples along the way. Findings – Hotspot identification methodologies have evolved considerably over the past 30 or so years, correcting for methodological deficiencies along the way. Despite vast and significant advancements, identifying hotspots remains a reactive approach to managing road safety – relying on crashes to accrue in order to mitigate their occurrence. The most fruitful directions for future research will be in the establishment of reliable relationships between surrogate measures of road safety – such as ‘near misses’ – and actual crashes – so that safety can be proactively managed without the need for crashes to accrue. Research implications – Research in hotspot identification will continue; however, it is likely to shift over time to both closer to ‘real-time’ crash risk detection and considering safety improvements using surrogate measures of road safety – described in Chapter 17. Practical implications – There are two types of errors made in hotspot detection – identifying a ‘risky’ site as ‘safe’ and identifying a ‘safe’ site as ‘risky’. In the former case no investments will be made to improve safety, while in the latter case ineffective or inefficient safety improvements could be made. To minimise these errors, transport network safety managers should be applying the current state of the practice methods for hotspot detection. Moreover, transport network safety managers should be eager to transition to proactive methods of network safety management to avoid the need for crashes to occur. While in its infancy, the use of surrogate measures of safety holds significant promise for the future.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransport and Sustainability
PublisherEmerald Publishing
Pages351-382
Number of pages32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameTransport and Sustainability
Volume11
ISSN (Print)2044-9941
ISSN (Electronic)2044-995X

Keywords

  • Blackspots
  • Hotspots
  • Safety management
  • Surrogate safety measures
  • Transport network management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting high-risk accident locations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this