Determining stiffness modulus by means of different mechanical testing

F. P. Pramesti; M. R. Poot; M. F.C. Van De Ven; A. A.A. Molenaar

doi:10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132

Determining stiffness modulus by means of different mechanical testing

F. P. Pramesti, M. R. Poot, M. F.C. Van De Ven, A. A.A. Molenaar

Pavement Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Scientific › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

197 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many research on mechanistic testing have come to likely conclusion that different test setup results in different performance. The aim of this paper is to analyse the stiffness modulus resulting from three different test setups, namely; Monotonic Uniaxial Tension Test (MUTT), Monotonic Uniaxial Compression Test (MUCT), and Indirect Tensile Test (ITT). They are monotonic tests. This paper will elaborate if there is any significant difference among the result of the first three tests. Master curves of stiffness modulus as a function of strain rate at reference temperature of 15 C were developed. The results show that there is no significance difference between the modulus resulting from the three tests performed at high strain rates. It's also shown that at low strain rate, the elastic modulus resulting from compression tests is in between indirect and uniaxial tension test's elastic modulus.

Original language	English
Article number	012132
Number of pages	10
Journal	IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Volume	615
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132
Publication status	Published - 2019
Event	7th International Conference on Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum, EACEF 2019 - Stuttgart, Germany Duration: 30 Sept 2019 → 2 Oct 2019

Access to Document

10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132

ID 1262_DETERMINING STIFFNESS MODULUS_CRF_V7.0Final published version, 1.03 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a99184f9f4e049e1b68a645461d1dafa,

title = "Determining stiffness modulus by means of different mechanical testing",

abstract = "Many research on mechanistic testing have come to likely conclusion that different test setup results in different performance. The aim of this paper is to analyse the stiffness modulus resulting from three different test setups, namely; Monotonic Uniaxial Tension Test (MUTT), Monotonic Uniaxial Compression Test (MUCT), and Indirect Tensile Test (ITT). They are monotonic tests. This paper will elaborate if there is any significant difference among the result of the first three tests. Master curves of stiffness modulus as a function of strain rate at reference temperature of 15 C were developed. The results show that there is no significance difference between the modulus resulting from the three tests performed at high strain rates. It's also shown that at low strain rate, the elastic modulus resulting from compression tests is in between indirect and uniaxial tension test's elastic modulus.",

author = "Pramesti, {F. P.} and Poot, {M. R.} and {Van De Ven}, {M. F.C.} and Molenaar, {A. A.A.}",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132",

language = "English",

volume = "615",

journal = "IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering",

issn = "1757-8981",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

number = "1",

note = "7th International Conference on Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum, EACEF 2019 ; Conference date: 30-09-2019 Through 02-10-2019",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining stiffness modulus by means of different mechanical testing

AU - Pramesti, F. P.

AU - Poot, M. R.

AU - Van De Ven, M. F.C.

AU - Molenaar, A. A.A.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Many research on mechanistic testing have come to likely conclusion that different test setup results in different performance. The aim of this paper is to analyse the stiffness modulus resulting from three different test setups, namely; Monotonic Uniaxial Tension Test (MUTT), Monotonic Uniaxial Compression Test (MUCT), and Indirect Tensile Test (ITT). They are monotonic tests. This paper will elaborate if there is any significant difference among the result of the first three tests. Master curves of stiffness modulus as a function of strain rate at reference temperature of 15 C were developed. The results show that there is no significance difference between the modulus resulting from the three tests performed at high strain rates. It's also shown that at low strain rate, the elastic modulus resulting from compression tests is in between indirect and uniaxial tension test's elastic modulus.

AB - Many research on mechanistic testing have come to likely conclusion that different test setup results in different performance. The aim of this paper is to analyse the stiffness modulus resulting from three different test setups, namely; Monotonic Uniaxial Tension Test (MUTT), Monotonic Uniaxial Compression Test (MUCT), and Indirect Tensile Test (ITT). They are monotonic tests. This paper will elaborate if there is any significant difference among the result of the first three tests. Master curves of stiffness modulus as a function of strain rate at reference temperature of 15 C were developed. The results show that there is no significance difference between the modulus resulting from the three tests performed at high strain rates. It's also shown that at low strain rate, the elastic modulus resulting from compression tests is in between indirect and uniaxial tension test's elastic modulus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074645769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132

DO - 10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012132

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85074645769

SN - 1757-8981

VL - 615

JO - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

JF - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

IS - 1

M1 - 012132

T2 - 7th International Conference on Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum, EACEF 2019

Y2 - 30 September 2019 through 2 October 2019

ER -

Determining stiffness modulus by means of different mechanical testing

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this