Deterministic vs. robust design optimization using DEM-based metamodels

Marc P. Fransen*, Matthijs Langelaar, Dingena L. Schott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In design optimization of bulk handling equipment (BHE) we generally focus on the mean performance of the equipment. However, granular materials behave stochastic due to irregularities in particle shape and size which leads to stochastic performance of the equipment. To include the stochastic performance we propose robust metamodel-based design optimization (MBDO). The used metamodels are trained with stochastic performance data from randomly repeated discrete element method (DEM) simulations and predict mean and variance of the equipment performance. This method is compared to the conventional deterministic optimization method by means of a case study of a discharging hopper including verification and validation. The robust MBDO shows more distinctive optimal designs compared to the deterministic approach. In addition, the DEM-based metamodel is a relatively accurate method to predict DEM-model simulation results. However, the validation indicates that differences between DEM-model and experimental results highly affect the reliability of the found optima.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118526
Number of pages14
JournalPowder Technology
Volume425
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Deterministic optimization
  • Metamodels
  • Optima validation
  • Robust optimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deterministic vs. robust design optimization using DEM-based metamodels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this