TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a multi-scale framework to predict and evaluate cohesion and adhesion of rejuvenated bitumen
T2 - Insights from molecular dynamics simulations and experiments
AU - Ren, Shisong
AU - Poot, Marco
AU - Liu, Xueyan
AU - Erkens, Sandra
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Rejuvenators are crucial for efficient asphalt pavement recycling, but their effectiveness varies widely based on factors like bitumen source, aging degree, and rejuvenator composition. This study aims to develop a multiscale evaluation methodology to assess the cohesive and adhesive performance of rejuvenated bitumen, integrating molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and experimental testing. Molecular models of rejuvenated bitumen are established to predict nanoscale cohesion energy and the linear amplitude sweep (LAS) tests for fatigue evaluation. Bitumen-aggregate interface models undergo MD simulations for adhesion assessment, validated by pull-off tension tests, while microstructural observations clarify debonding mechanisms. Results show that bio-oil is the most effective rejuvenator for restoring aged bitumen's cohesion, followed by engine-oil, naphthenic-oil, and aromatic-oil. LAS tests confirm these rankings for both bitumen and mastic, with Filler Wigro outperforming Wigro60K in reducing cohesive cracking risk. While aging decreases adhesion property, rejuvenators restore both cohesive and adhesive performance, with bio-oil achieving 44.4 % restoration of adhesion when adding 10 % by weight of bitumen. Additionally, MD simulations reveal that the work of adhesion (Waa) negatively correlates with fatigue parameter (G*sinδ) and positively with fatigue life (Nf), and both Waa and the work of bonding adhesion (WBA) decrease linearly with the pull-off tension strength (POTS) index. Bitumen TB is the most effective for improving cohesion crack resistance, whereas binder FB results in lower fatigue life. Overall, bio-oil proves most effective in restoring cohesion and adhesion across bitumen types and fillers, improving rejuvenated asphalt performance.
AB - Rejuvenators are crucial for efficient asphalt pavement recycling, but their effectiveness varies widely based on factors like bitumen source, aging degree, and rejuvenator composition. This study aims to develop a multiscale evaluation methodology to assess the cohesive and adhesive performance of rejuvenated bitumen, integrating molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and experimental testing. Molecular models of rejuvenated bitumen are established to predict nanoscale cohesion energy and the linear amplitude sweep (LAS) tests for fatigue evaluation. Bitumen-aggregate interface models undergo MD simulations for adhesion assessment, validated by pull-off tension tests, while microstructural observations clarify debonding mechanisms. Results show that bio-oil is the most effective rejuvenator for restoring aged bitumen's cohesion, followed by engine-oil, naphthenic-oil, and aromatic-oil. LAS tests confirm these rankings for both bitumen and mastic, with Filler Wigro outperforming Wigro60K in reducing cohesive cracking risk. While aging decreases adhesion property, rejuvenators restore both cohesive and adhesive performance, with bio-oil achieving 44.4 % restoration of adhesion when adding 10 % by weight of bitumen. Additionally, MD simulations reveal that the work of adhesion (Waa) negatively correlates with fatigue parameter (G*sinδ) and positively with fatigue life (Nf), and both Waa and the work of bonding adhesion (WBA) decrease linearly with the pull-off tension strength (POTS) index. Bitumen TB is the most effective for improving cohesion crack resistance, whereas binder FB results in lower fatigue life. Overall, bio-oil proves most effective in restoring cohesion and adhesion across bitumen types and fillers, improving rejuvenated asphalt performance.
KW - Cohesion fatigue cracking
KW - Interfacial adhesion
KW - Molecular dynamics simulations
KW - Pull-off tension test
KW - Rejuvenated bitumen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219366281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.113791
DO - 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.113791
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219366281
SN - 0264-1275
VL - 252
JO - Materials and Design
JF - Materials and Design
M1 - 113791
ER -