Device-independent two-party cryptography secure against sequential attacks

Jed Kaniewski, Stephanie Wehner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The goal of two-party cryptography is to enable two parties, Alice and Bob, to solve common tasks without the need for mutual trust. Examples of such tasks are private access to a database, and secure identification. Quantum communication enables security for all of these problems in the noisy-storage model by sending more signals than the adversary can store in a certain time frame. Here, we initiate the study of device-independent (DI) protocols for two-party cryptography in the noisy-storage model. Specifically, we present a relatively easy to implement protocol for a cryptographic building block known as weak string erasure and prove its security even if the devices used in the protocol are prepared by the dishonest party. DI two-party cryptography is made challenging by the fact that Alice and Bob do not trust each other, which requires new techniques to establish security. We fully analyse the case of memoryless devices (for which sequential attacks are optimal) and the case of sequential attacks for arbitrary devices. The key ingredient of the proof, which might be of independent interest, is an explicit (and tight) relation between the violation of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality observed by Alice and Bob and uncertainty generated by Alice against Bob who is forced to measure his system before finding out Alice's setting (guessing with postmeasurement information). In particular, we show that security is possible for arbitrarily small violation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalNew Journal of Physics
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • quantum cryptography
  • device-independent
  • two-party cryptography
  • CHSH inequality
  • uncertainty
  • nonlocality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Device-independent two-party cryptography secure against sequential attacks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this