Do Student Trials Predict What Professionals Value in Sustainable Design Practices?

Jeremy Faludi, Felix Yiu, Ola Srour, Rami Kamareddine, Omar Ali, Selim Mecanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When teaching sustainable design in industry or academia, we should teach design methods, activities, and mindsets that are most effective at driving real change in a industry. However, most studies of design practices are performed on students, not on professionals. How strongly do student perceptions of value predict those of industry teams designing real products? This study provided workshops on three sustainable design methods (The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping, and Biomimicry) for 172 professionals and 204 students, applying the methods to their actual products being developed. It surveyed both populations about which activities or mindsets within each design method provided sustainability value, innovation value, and overall value. Quantitatively, student results did not strongly predict professional opinions; professionals chose clearer favorites and valued more things. However, qualitatively, student results did predict the reasons why professionals would value the design activities and mindsets. Therefore, care should be taken to choose appropriate participants for the questions being asked in sustainable design research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102001
JournalJournal of Mechanical Design
Volume141
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • design education
  • design for environment
  • design methodology
  • design methods
  • design process
  • product design
  • sustainable design

Cite this