Abstract
Water treatment facilities are bound to incorporate resource recovery in the near future, necessitating novel economic assessments that capture the full economic potential of these systems. This study evaluates three cost calculation methods—Non-allocation, Economic allocation, and Dual allocation— to improve the accuracy of the Levelized Cost for multi-product desalination and brine treatment plants. The methods were tested across three technical scenarios: Sc1) maximum water recovery, Sc2) integrated desalination with brine treatment for resource recovery and Sc3) electricity-based desalination for chemical recovery. Results reveal that the traditional Non-allocation method tends to overestimate production costs by uniformly applying fixed costs across products, leading to inflated levelized costs. The Economic allocation approach reduces the levelized costs of water and other recovered products by up to 81 %, enhancing competitiveness with conventional production methods. The Dual allocation approach is most effective for recovered salts and chemicals, ensuring fair cost distribution and fostering competitiveness with linear systems. Sc2 is the most economically feasible under both novel approaches due to its balanced mix of high-value products and moderate operational costs. These findings suggest that cost calculation methods should align with plant objectives: Economic allocation for scenarios prioritizing water recovery and Dual allocation for maximizing the value of salts and chemicals. This study provides a foundation for tailored economic assessments and guides plant design and investment decisions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 118475 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Desalination |
Volume | 599 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- Brine treatment
- Desalination
- Economic assessment
- Levelized cost
- Resource recovery